تبیین تاثیر منتورینگ بر جانشین پروری: با تمرکز بر طرح توسعه فردی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش، تبیین تأثیر منتورینگ[1] بر جانشین‌پروری[2] با تمرکز بر طرح توسعه‌ی فردی[3] است. برای تبیین این موضوع، از مدل ستاره‌ای هفت‌نقطه‌ی جانشین‌پروری راثول استفاده شده است. در مرحله‌ی ششم این مدل، پس از مشخص‌شدن وجود شکاف بین وضعیت موجود و وضعیت مطلوب، ابزار مناسبی که می‌تواند این شکاف را پر کند، طرح توسعه‌ی فردی و روش یا شیوه‌ی مناسب برای اجرای طرح توسعه‌ی فردی، منتورینگ است. جامعه‌ی آماری این پژوهش 400 نفر از کارکنانی هستند که در مرکز تحقیقات مخابرات ایران دوره‌های آموزشی و تخصصی را برای بهبود و ارتقای مهارت خود گذرانده‌اند و نمونه‌ی پژوهش، مطابق با فرمول کوکران 200 نفر می‌باشد. روش پژوهشی، توصیفی همبستگی و ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها پرسش‌نامه بوده است. آزمون فرضیه‌های پژوهشی براساس روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. نتایج، حاکی از آن است که کارکردهای توسعه‌ی کار راهه‌ی شغلی و مدل‌سازی نقش می‌توانند در اجرای طرح توسعه‌ی فردی مثمرثمر باشند؛ ولی کارکردهای روانی‌اجتماعی نمی‌توانند تأثیری بر طرح توسعه‌ی فردی داشته باشند.
[1]. Mentoring [2]. Succession Planning [3]. Individual Development Plan

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Mentoring on Succession Planning: Focusing on Individual Development Plan

نویسنده [English]

  • mohammad hashemi
چکیده [English]

This research is aimed at explaining the effect of mentoring on succession planning focusing on individual developing plan. Raoul’s seven-pointed star model was used for the explanation of this issue. After the identification of the gap between the present situation and that of the desired one in the sixth phase, mentoring with individual development planning was recognized as the best tool for filling it. Research population included 400 employees who have taken the specific instructions for increasing their skills in Telecommunication Company of Iran. According to Cochran Formula, the sample group included 200 subjects. For collecting data for this descriptive correlative research, questionnaires were designed. Hypotheses were tested by structural equation modeling. The results indicated that the functions of career development and role modeling can be effective in the execution of individual development plan.  

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • succession planning
  • Mentoring
  • Individual Development Plan

بردبار، غلامرضا؛ کریمی، اوژن؛ زارع، ناصر و کنجکاو منفرد، امیررضا (1390). شناسایی مؤلفه­ها و الگوهای شایسته­گزینی برای مدل جانشین­پروری کارکنان، دوفصلنامه‌ی پژوهش­های مدیریت منابع انسانی، تهران: دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع). 4 (1). 87-114.

فرهی بوزنجانی، برزو؛ عابدی جعفری، حسن و مهدوی، موسی (1387). طراحی و تبیین الگوی توسعه‌ی منابع انسانی (استادان دانشگاه) مبتنی بر نگرش فطرت‌گرا و توسعه‌ی ارتباطات چهارگانه. فصلنامه‌ی پژوهش­های مدیریت منابع انسانی، تهران: دانشگاه جامع امام حسین (ع). 1 (1). 19-50.

Bandura, A. (1971). Social Learning Theory, General learning Corporation.

Barnett, R., & Davis, S. (2008). Creating Greater Success in Succession Planning. Advances in Developing Human Resources 10 (5): 721-739.

Clutterbuck, D. (2011). Mentoring and Succession Planning. http://www.gpstrategiesltd.com/ downloads-library/clutterbuck associates / articles /mentoring-and-succession-planning. shtml.

Edwards, B. (2008). 8 Mistakes Made In Succession Planning …and How to Fix Them. www.linkageinc.com

Egan, T. M., & Song, Z. (2008). Are Facilitated Mentoring Programs Beneficial? A Randomized Experimental Field Study. Vocational Behavior, 72, 351–362.

Field, J. (2001). Mentoring: A Natural Act for Information Professionals? New Library World, 102 (1166/1167), 269-273.

Fitsimmons, G. (2013). Library Leadership Collective Succession Planning In Librarianship. The Bottom Line: Managing library finances, 26 (4), 42-143.

Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Mesurement Error, Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50.

Gao, S., L. Mokhtarian, P., & A. Johnston, R. (2008). Nonnormality of Data in Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2082, 116–124.

Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly, J. H., & Konopaske, R. (2006). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gillian, B. (2011). Learning to Lead in the 'year of the Firsts': A Study of Employer Led Mentoring for New School Leaders in Scotland. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Glasgow.

Haggard, D. L., Dougherty, T. W., Turban, D. B., & Wilbanks, J. E. (2011). Who is a Mentor? A Review of Evolving Definitions and Implications for Research. Journal of Management, 37(1), 280-304.

Hallam, P. R., Chou, P. N., Hite, J. M., & Hite, S. J. (2012). Beginning Teachers Two Contrasting Models for Mentoring as They Affect Retention of Beginning Teachers. NASSP Bulletin, 96(3), 243–278.

Hart, E. W. (2009). Seven Keys to Successful Mentoring. Center for Creative Leadership. United States.

Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.

Haynes, R. K., & Ghosh, R. (2008). Mentoring and Succession. Management: An Evaluative Approach to the Strategic Collaboration Model. Review of Business.

Henderson, J. (2006). The Value Of Succession Planning. School of Global Leadership & Entrepreneurship, Regent University.

Hezlett, S. A., & Gibson, S. K. (2005). Mentoring and Human Resource Development: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7: 446.

Huang, C., Wang, Y., Wu, T. & Wang, P. (2013). An Empirical Analysis of the Antecedents and Performance Consequences of Using the Moodle Platform, International Journal of Information and Education Technoloy, 3 (2), 217-221.

Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and Undergraduate Academic Success: A Literature Review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505-532.

Kim, S. (2007). Learning Goal Orientation, Formal Mentoring, and Leadership Competence in HRD A Conceptual Model. European Industrial Training, 31 ( 3), 181-194.

Klasen, N., & Clutterbuck, D. (2002). Implementing Mentoring Schemes, A Practical Guide to Successful Programs. Butterworth-Heinemann, London.

Klein, M.F., & Salk, R.J. (2013). Presidential Succession Planning: A Qualitative Study in Private Higher Education. Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(3), 335–345.

Kram, K.E. (1983). Phases of the Mentor Relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 608-25.

Mahapatro, B. B. (2010). Human Resource Management (1st ed).  New Age International.

Mathis, R.L., & Jackson, J. H. (2000). Human Resource Management (9th ed.). South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnatti.

Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2011). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Americas, New York.

Office of Disaster Assistance, ODA. (2010). Individual Development Plan Guidebook. Retrieved from https://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/SBA %20IDP%20Guidebook.pdf.

Park, H. M. (2008). Univariate Analysis and Normality Test Using SAS, Stata, and SPSS. Working Paper. http://www.indiana.edu/~statmath/stat/all/normality/index.html.

Pask, R., & Joy, B. (2007). Mentoring-Coaching: A Guide for Education Professionals. McGraw-Hill, London.

Patel, S., Kitchen, G., & Barrie, J. (2013).Personal Development Plans-Practical Pitfalls. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 220-223.

Ragins, B.R. & Cotton, J.L. (1999). Mentor Functions and Outcomes: A Comparison of Men and Women in Formal and Informal Mentoring Relationships, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 529-50.

Rothwell, W.J. (2010). Effective Succession Planning: Ensuring Leadership Continuity and Building Talent from Within (4th ed.). American Management Association. United States of America.

Singh, V., Bains, D., & Vinnicombe, S. (2002). Informal Mentoring as an Organisational Resource. Long Range Planning. 35,389–405.

The American Institute Of Architects (AIA). (2012). Mentoring Essentials for IDP Supervisors and Mentors. http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/aia/documents/pdf/aiab090436.pdf

Vieira, A. L. (2011). Interactive LISREL in Practice, Getting Started with a SIMPLIS Approach. Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London and New York.